<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photoshop Explained: Vibrance versus Saturation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographworks.com/2010/07/08/photoshop-explains-vibrance-versus-saturation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographworks.com/2010/07/08/photoshop-explains-vibrance-versus-saturation/</link>
	<description>photography, image editing, and typography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:00:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.photographworks.com/2010/07/08/photoshop-explains-vibrance-versus-saturation/comment-page-1/#comment-4874</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographworks.com/?p=1935#comment-4874</guid>
		<description>Interesting question. I just did the test and put up three images showing the slider at the maximum, minimum, and mid point positions.

You will find the test here at: Photoshop: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.photographworks.com/2012/01/11/vibrance-at-maximum-minimum/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Vibrance At Maximum, Minimum, And Mid-Point&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting question. I just did the test and put up three images showing the slider at the maximum, minimum, and mid point positions.</p>
<p>You will find the test here at: Photoshop: <a href="http://www.photographworks.com/2012/01/11/vibrance-at-maximum-minimum/" rel="nofollow">Vibrance At Maximum, Minimum, And Mid-Point</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antoine</title>
		<link>http://www.photographworks.com/2010/07/08/photoshop-explains-vibrance-versus-saturation/comment-page-1/#comment-4873</link>
		<dc:creator>Antoine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 04:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographworks.com/?p=1935#comment-4873</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the information. There&#039;s one more thing I&#039;d like to know though. I understand the effect of Vibrance when the slider is pushed towards the right. But what happens when pushed towards the left? Does it reduce the saturation of the higher saturated colors with less effect on lower saturated colors? Or the opposite?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the information. There&#8217;s one more thing I&#8217;d like to know though. I understand the effect of Vibrance when the slider is pushed towards the right. But what happens when pushed towards the left? Does it reduce the saturation of the higher saturated colors with less effect on lower saturated colors? Or the opposite?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.photographworks.com/2010/07/08/photoshop-explains-vibrance-versus-saturation/comment-page-1/#comment-4648</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 10:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographworks.com/?p=1935#comment-4648</guid>
		<description>Changes in Camera Raw are not baked in to the file. Changes in Photoshop are. Apart from that the actual changes are the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Changes in Camera Raw are not baked in to the file. Changes in Photoshop are. Apart from that the actual changes are the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

